5 Big Mario Moments



(CNN)Hard to believe it has been 30 years since we were first told "our princess is in another castle."
For those of you not familiar with the reference, "Super Mario Bros.," one of the most popular video games of all time, turned 30 on Sunday.
It was first released in Japan on September 13, 1985, by Nintendo, putting that video game company on the map.
It was a sequel to the one-screen game "Mario Bros." (which introduced Mario's brother Luigi), which was itself a sequel to the smash hit of the early 1980s game "Donkey Kong" (in which Mario attempted to defeat the angry gorilla).
Mario is the closest thing to Mickey Mouse in the world of video games, an instantly recognizable symbol of gaming and a mascot for Nintendo.

Here are five big moments in the history of the high-jumping, pipe-traveling plumber:

The importance of the Nintendo Entertainment System, or NES, cannot be understated.
The gaming system was released in the U.S. in late 1985 -- after "Mario's" introduction -- and was a monster hit.
It was literally a "game changer," in that the games one could play on the 8-bit system brought the graphics and fun of an arcade to your home. Many previous systems like Atari's were low-quality versions of some arcade games with blocky graphics.
It also gave us the "side-scroller" game allowing players to move through various lands and worlds, instead of being in one stationary setting.
Everyone who got an NES received "Super Mario Bros.," creating a legion of fans. It didn't hurt that it was a lot of fun to play, as Mario and his brother jumped, squished and warped their way through a strange world of "koopas" and "goombas" called Mushroom Kingdom, on the lookout for Princess Peach, held captive by the evil Bowser (or King Koopa).
Future Nintendo game systems would almost always include a new "Super Mario" sequel or spinoff, including the Super Nintendo, Game Boy and multiple versions of the hand-held DS.

In 1989, Nintendo tossed its controller into the children's TV ring with "The Super Mario Bros. Super Show," a half live-action, half animated expansion of the "Mario" brand to other platforms (though "Legend of Zelda" stepped in on Friday afternoons).
Captain Lou Albano of wrestling fame portrayed Mario in the live-action portions, which were a bit of a callback to Sid and Marty Krofft series of the 1970s.
The show was successful enough to get spun off to Saturday mornings on NBC for a few more seasons.

"Mario Kart" translated the "Super Mario" characters to the racetrack in 1992, and this game and its many, many sequels are some of the most popular racing games of all time.
It was followed by another of the many spinoffs, 1998's "Mario Party" (not to mention the earlier 1991 spinoff "Dr. Mario").

The bright and happy world of "Super Mario Bros." was inevitably translated into a feature film in 1993, a movie that had more in common with "Blade Runner" than anything on a gaming console.
Bob Hoskins, a few years after "Who Framed Roger Rabbit," starred as Mario Mario, with up-and-coming John Leguizamo as Luigi Mario.
Dennis Hopper chewed the scenery as the reptilian King Koopa.
Directors Annabel Jankel and Rocky Morton went from creating "Max Headroom" to turning Mushroom Kingdom into a dystopian hellscape with evolved dinosaurs.
The movie got abysmal reviews, but it's not like no one warned us.
In 1992, the Los Angeles Times went to the set and came back with quotes like this: "The directors won't give interviews? That's the smartest thing I've heard from them. That's the only intelligent thing I've heard that they've really actually done."
That was from Hopper, one of the stars.
In 2007, Hoskins called the film a "nightmare" and "the worst thing I've ever done."
The (slightly) better Mario-related film might have been "The Wizard," a feature length ad for Nintendo, where the purpose of the heroes is to win a "Super Mario Bros. 3" tournament.

Back in the video game world, Super Mario continued to make strides. In 1996, Nintendo 64 was released along with "Super Mario 64," which created a three-dimensional world for Mario and friends to explore.
It's considered one of the most challenging and best games of all time.

Today, following the even more expansive "Super Mario Galaxy" games, Nintendo has just released a DIY version, "Super Mario Maker," in which fans can create their own Mario levels.
So here's to 30 more years of gaming fun with the lovable Mario. Perhaps one day we'll be playing with a life-size holographic Mario and Luigi.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49d64b83/sc/27/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C130Ctech0Csuper0Emario0Ebros0E30Ath0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Elon Musk's New Idea: Nuke Mars



(CNN)Never let it be said that Elon Musk isn't full of ideas.
The man who gave us the Tesla electric car, who has big plans for his SpaceX rocket company and who has proposed the tantalizing Hyperloop dropped another bomb during his appearance on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" on Wednesday.
Almost literally.
CNNMoney: Colbert says Musk should run for president
Musk, a proponent of traveling to Mars, noted that the Red Planet is currently a "fixer-upper" but could be made habitable for humans.
"First, you're going to have to live in transparent domes, but eventually, you can transform Mars into an Earth-like planet. You can warm it up," he said.
The warming could happen quickly or slowly, he added. The quick way?
"Drop thermonuclear weapons over the poles," Musk said.
Colbert, who had been trying to figure out whether Musk was a superhero or supervillain, decided on the latter after the exchange -- an opinion echoed, tongue in cheek, on social media.
Is Musk's plan feasible? Scientists were skeptical.
"It seems possible to make it Earthlike, but there's a lot of barriers to overcome," University of Colorado atmospheric and ocean sciences professor Brian Toon told the Los Angeles Times. "Blowing up bombs is not a good one."
In a statement to the Los Angeles paper, NASA took the high road.
"We are also committed to promoting exploration of the solar system in a way that protects explored environments as they exist in their natural state," the space agency said.
And Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University, told U.S. News that nuclear bombs come with their own problems.
Instead of warming Mars, the explosions could cause nuclear winter, "wherein you generate so much dust and particles that they literally block out a significant portion of the incoming sunlight, cooling down the planet," he said.
Musk, who told Colbert that he expects to be transporting NASA astronauts to the space station in two years, didn't address how he'd get the bombs from Earth to Mars, either -- which, given the occasional accidents involving rocketry, runs its own risks.
Still, the mogul said he's only trying to come up with solutions.
"I'm trying to do useful things," he told Colbert.
Bizarre Mars photos: Signs of life, or signs the internet has lost its mind?


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49cbe956/sc/14/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C110Cus0Celon0Emusk0Emars0Enuclear0Ebomb0Ecolbert0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Bees Get Tiny Backpacks



(CNN)It's never been harder to be a bee.
Parasites, diseases and habitat loss have all taken a toll on bees and other pollinating insects, a crucial part of the global food production network, with billions of dollars riding on their tiny backs.
Now, a handful have something else riding on those backs: little sensors placed there to help researchers track their movements and learn more about how bees react to stresses in their environment.
Researchers with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia have glued trackers that measure only a quarter of a centimeter onto the backs of the bees, a configuration some have likened to tiny bee backpacks.
The trackers use radio-frequency identification technology to record information when the bees pass a data logger.
Because bees tend to be predictable, deviations from that routine can help researchers identify stressors in the bee's environment and develop ways to help them, according to the organization.
"The tiny technology allows researchers to analyse the effects of stress factors including disease, pesticides, air pollution, water contamination, diet and extreme weather on the movements of bees and their ability to pollinate," Paulo de Souza, the organization's science leader, said in a statement.
Opinion: How pesticides are killing the bees
Concerns about the collapse of honeybee colonies have circled the globe in recent years, but nowhere has the situation been worse than in the United States.
According to the Bee Informed Partnership, a coalition of universities and research labs involved in honeybee research, U.S. beekeepers lost 42.1% of their colonies between April 2014 and April 2015.
Commercially managed colonies in the United States have declined from 6 million in 1947 to a little over 2.6 million in 2013, according to U.S. and U.N. statistics.
Even the White House has sounded the alarm, noting that honeybees are crucial to the production of 90 North American crops and contribute $15 billion a year to the U.S. economy.
Obama announces plan to save honey bees
Europe has seen smaller, but no less alarming, losses.
Beekeepers in the UK lost nearly 35% of their colonies in from 2012 to 2013, and although that trend has slowed, the European Commission has put a temporary ban on some pesticides and taken other steps to try to protect the bees.
Explanations for the declines run the gamut from life-sucking mites to pesticides to disease, habitat loss, cell phone radiation, aluminum contamination and as-yet-unexplained causes.
Though Australia hasn't had such dire issues, that actually makes it a great place to do research, said Saul Cunninghan, a pollination researcher for the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
"This puts Australia in a good position to act as a control group for research on this major issue that could one day become our problem too," he said.
What will happen if the bees disappear?


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4947d8fb/sc/31/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A80C250Cliving0Choneybees0Ebackpack0Etrackers0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

A Folding Paper Microscope? It's Real



(CNN)Sometimes, inventors come up with things the world wants. The Rubik's Cube. iPhones. Snuggies. Then there are the things the world needs. The wheel. Penicillin. Anything with caffeine in it.
The Foldscope might just fit into both of those categories.
The Foldscope is a folding paper microscope that costs less than a buck to manufacture but is durable and amazingly useful, according to inventor Manu Prakash of Stanford University, as well as one researcher who's used it in the field.
"Long story short, this device is amazing," entomologist and science reporter Aaron Pomerantz wrote on his site last month after taking one to the Peruvian Amazon rainforest. "I was able to investigate tiny insects, mites, fungi and plant cells from 140X (magnification) to 480X."
But it's also simple and easy enough for kids to put together and use, bioengineer Prakash told The Atlantic.
"The biggest thing we're trying to do is to make people curious," he told the magazine. "Our ambition is that every kid should be able to carry a microscope in their pocket."
The microscope is printed on thick paper and is assembled origami-style in just a few minutes. The paper, lens and other parts cost about 50 cents, according to Stanford.
Last year, Prakash and his team distributed 10,000 Foldscopes to eager users willing to test them out. Users are submitting their findings at the Foldscope site, with investigations ranging from first-graders looking at banana seeds to detection of parasitic worms in fecal samples.
That last bit is important. Beyond inspiring curiosity, Prakash hopes Foldscopes can help health care workers quickly, cheaply and safely diagnose blood-borne illnesses in the field.
"I wanted to make the best possible disease-detection instrument that we could almost distribute for free. What came out of this project is what we call use-and-throw microscopy," he said in a Stanford blog post last year.
Unfortunately, Foldscope isn't currently available, unless you want to try to make your own.

Prakash's team says it is "working hard to make the microscopes commercially available via a spinoff/startup."
There's no word on when that might happen.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49ab1bc4/sc/27/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A80Ctech0Cpaper0Emicroscope0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Billie Holiday Returns To The Apollo -- As A Hologram



(CNN)More than 56 years after her death, jazz singer Billie Holiday is returning to Harlem's famed Apollo Theater, as a hologram of sorts.
To bring back the singer known as "Lady Day," who died in 1959, the theater is partnering with Hologram USA, which also produced the digital resurrection of Tupac Shakur at the Coachella Music Festival in 2012.
The idea apparently isn't to re-create Holiday for concerts but rather as part of a permanent educational installation at the historic theater.
"Billie is going to be able to talk about the history of the Apollo. She can take questions from the audience in an interesting way. She can sing some songs," The New York Times quoted Apollo President Jonelle Procope as saying.
The theater has a deal with Holiday's estate to re-create the singer, and her voice will be used in the show, according to the Times. Holiday appeared at the Apollo more than 30 times.
This latest appearance won't be quite a full-on Princess-Leia-popping-out-of-R2-D2's-head sort of a hologram.
To create its images, Hologram USA uses a modern twist on an old stage trick called "Pepper's Ghost," in which ghostly images from a hidden part of a scene or stage appear on a piece of glass visible to the audience.
The technology bringing Sinatra, Tupac back to life
The company's website says it sometimes uses body doubles and animation techniques to create its imagery. It can also use motion-capture technology.
Hologram USA will use the tech to bring back country singer Patsy Cline for a concert experience in 2016 and plans to use it to digitally revive classic comedians including for the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York.
Holiday, who would have turned 100 this year, is among the most revered and influential voices in jazz. She recorded her first record at 18, according to her website, and played with some of the most acclaimed musicians of her time.
April: Celebrating Billie Holiday's 100th birthday


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49cbe957/sc/17/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C10A0Centertainment0Cbillie0Eholiday0Eapollo0Etheater0Ehologram0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Pluto On The Horizon


NASA's New Horizons spacecraft is the first spacecraft to explore Pluto and its moons.

Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49c66e19/sc/27/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A140C0A80C250Ctech0Cgallery0Cpluto0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Britain's Battleship Of The Future



(CNN)Torpedoes that travel at almost 350 mph, an electromagnetic rail gun with the range of cruise missiles, a quad-copter that fires lasers, drones made on board and a holographic control room.
Those are just a few of the things that some of Britain's youngest and brightest scientists and engineers came up with when the country's Ministry of Defense challenged them to envision the battleship of the future.
The scientists and engineers from defense contractors, the Ministry of Defense and the Royal Navy brought their ideas together in what's dubbed "Dreadnought 2050," an homage to the HMS Dreadnought, a 20,000-ton, 527-foot-long battleship launched in 1906. The HMS Dreadnought "represented such an advance that all other major warships were rendered obsolete," according to a press release from Startpoint, the Royal Navy organization overseeing the current project.
Startpoint says its mission is to "tackle parallel challenges of providing advanced technology set against the backdrop of funding constraints." Looking at the artist's conceptions of Dreadnought 2050, "cheap" is not a word that comes to mind. Words like "starship" or "battlestar" seem more apt.
Dreadnought 2050 is a tri-hull design and it's not steel as most battle ships are. It's an ultra-strong, see-through acrylic, Startpoint says.
The ship does away with the traditional mast, using instead a quad-copter tethered to the ship with carbon nanotubes that would carry power for sensors and a laser gun to take out nearby threats.
For threats farther off, there's an electomagnetic rail gun on the bow that can fire a projectile hundreds of miles. Tubes in the two outrigger hulls would be armed with "supercavitating" torpedoes, which go so fast that they vaporize the water around them and create an air pocket that lets them fly through the water.
The aft section of Dreadnought 2050 would have a flight deck for drones that could be made onboard using 3-D printing technologies and a "moon pool," a floodable deck from which amphibious troops could be dispatched on missions.
Is U.S. F-35 worth $400 billion?
Control for all this comes from what the Royal Navy dubs the "Ops Room," in the center of which is a holographic command table linking all the ship's systems to commanders aboard, Royal Navy and Ministry of Defense headquarters and even NATO allies, according to Startpoint. The Ops Room would be manned by only five people, compared to 25 on today's ships, and the entire ship could be run by as few as 50, compared to about 200 on those in service now.
With manpower a major cost for militaries, that's where a big chunk of cost savings comes in.
While it all may seem a bit of head-in-the-stars thinking, the Royal Navy says that's exactly the point.
"The Royal Navy needs visionary, innovative thinking and these concepts point the way to cutting edge technology which can be acquired at less cost and operated with less manpower than anything at sea today in the world's leading navies," Startpoint senior executive Muir Macdonald says in the press release.
To be sure, see-through hulls may not be around the corner, but some of the technologies are here now. The U.S. Navy is testing ship-borne lasers and rail-gun prototypes, and 3-D printing is something even civilians can get their hands on.
And maybe projects like this will have some of those tech-savvy civilians thinking about the defense industry.
"We want to attract the best new talent to sea to operate, maintain and develop systems with this level of ambition," Cmdr. Steve Prest, the Royal Navy's fleet robotics officer, says in the Startpoint statement.
U.S. Army picks new vehicle to replace the Humvee


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/498233bf/sc/31/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A20Cpolitics0Cbritain0Ewarship0Eof0Ethe0Efuture0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Chevy Malibu Reports Back To Parents On Teens' Driving



(CNN)Teen drivers often have more confidence than experience -- maybe they drive a little faster than they should, follow the car in front a little too closely or try some things behind the wheel they aren't prepared for.
New technology to debut in the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu could give parents of new drivers the ability to supervise and teach their teens before they form bad driving habits.
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens. Per mile driven, the fatal crash rate for drivers age 16 to 19 is nearly three times the rate for drivers age 20 and older, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports.
Related: How to keep teens from texting and driving
Chevy says its technology, called Teen Driver, is a first for the industry: a built-in system that tracks car data, allowing parents to view how their teen drove. The system records distance traveled, maximum speed, when the car had to engage stability control and anti-lock brakes, as well as the number of alerts issued by other safety features.
Those features, such as traction control, forward collision alert or forward collision braking, are automatically turned on when Teen Driver is activated through a preprogrammed key. The radio will remain muted until front safety belts are fastened, and parents can set the radio's maximum volume so it won't be a distraction.
Related: Distracted driving a serious danger for teens
The teen behind the wheel will get audible and visual warnings if the vehicle travels over a parent-set maximum speed between 40 and 75 mph. Teen driver doesn't stop the car from being able to speed, and the driver could ignore all the warning and alarms, but the driver's parents can check up on them using Teen Driver's Report Card, a summary of the system's records.
"We designed this to be used as a teaching tool," said MaryAnn Beebe, a Chevrolet safety engineer and mother. "It gives the teen a chance to prove to mom and dad, 'Hey, I've been driving responsibly,' and if there are things on the report that need discussion -- if your teen has had the car for a week and comes back with seven forward collision alerts -- then maybe there is an opportunity to talk about areas where maybe the teen could use some improvement."
The 2016 Chevy Malibu will be available to consumers in fall 2015. Exact pricing has yet to be announced, although Teen Driver will come standard in one model. Chevrolet says it intends to have the Teen Driver feature standard in all models in the future.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49bc1eda/sc/14/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C10A0Chealth0Cchevy0Emalibu0Eteen0Edriver0Ereport0Ecard0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Is It OK To Shoot Down A Drone Over Your Backyard?


Bruce Schneier is a security technologist and chief technology officer of Resilient Systems Inc. His latest book is "Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World." He blogs at schneier.com and tweets @schneierblog. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN)Last month, a Kentucky man shot down a drone that was hovering near his backyard.
WDRB News reported that the camera drone's owners soon showed up at the home of the shooter, William H. Merideth: "Four guys came over to confront me about it, and I happened to be armed, so that changed their minds," Merideth said. "They asked me, 'Are you the S-O-B that shot my drone?' and I said, 'Yes I am,'" he said. "I had my 40 mm Glock on me and they started toward me and I told them, 'If you cross my sidewalk, there's gonna be another shooting.'" Police charged Meredith with criminal mischief and wanton endangerment.
This is a trend. People have shot down drones in southern New Jersey and rural California as well. It's illegal, and they get arrested for it.
Technology changes everything. Specifically, it upends long-standing societal balances around issues like security and privacy. When a capability becomes possible, or cheaper, or more common, the changes can be far-reaching. Rebalancing security and privacy after technology changes capabilities can be very difficult, and take years. And we're not very good at it.
The security threats from drones are real, and the government is taking them seriously. In January, a man lost control of his drone, which crashed on the White House lawn. In May, another man was arrested for trying to fly his drone over the White House fence, and another last week for flying a drone into the stadium where the U.S. Open was taking place.
Drones have attempted to deliver drugs to prisons in Maryland, Ohio and South Carolina -- so far.
There have been many near-misses between drones and airplanes. Many people have written about the possible terrorist uses of drones.
Defenses are being developed. Both Lockheed Martin and Boeing sell anti-drone laser weapons. One company sells shotgun shells specifically designed to shoot down drones.
Other companies are working on technologies to detect and disable them safely. Some of those technologies were used to provide security at this year's Boston Marathon.

Law enforcement can deploy these technologies, but under current law it's illegal to shoot down a drone, even if it's hovering above your own property. In our society, you're generally not allowed to take the law into your own hands. You're expected to call the police and let them deal with it.
There's an alternate theory, though, from law professor Michael Froomkin. He argues that self-defense should be permissible against drones simply because you don't know their capabilities. We know, for example, that people have mounted guns on drones, which means they could pose a threat to life. Note that this legal theory has not been tested in court.
Increasingly, government is regulating drones and drone flights both at the state level and by the FAA. There are proposals to require that drones have an identifiable transponder, or no-fly zones programmed into the drone software.
Still, a large number of security issues remain unresolved. How do we feel about drones with long-range listening devices, for example? Or drones hovering outside our property and photographing us through our windows?
What's going on is that drones have changed how we think about security and privacy within our homes, by removing the protections we used to get from fences and walls. Of course, being spied on and shot at from above is nothing new, but access to those technologies was expensive and largely the purview of governments and some corporations. Drones put these capabilities into the hands of hobbyists, and we don't know what to do about it.
The issues around drones will get worse as we move from remotely piloted aircraft to true drones: aircraft that operate autonomously from a computer program. For the first time, autonomous robots -- with ever-increasing intelligence and capabilities at an ever-decreasing cost -- will have access to public spaces. This will create serious problems for society, because our legal system is largely based on deterring human miscreants rather than their proxies.
Our desire to shoot down a drone hovering nearby is understandable, given its potential threat. Society's need for people not to take the law into their own hands -- and especially not to fire guns into the air -- is also understandable. These two positions are increasingly coming into conflict, and will require increasing government regulation to sort out. But more importantly, we need to rethink our assumptions of security and privacy in a world of autonomous drones, long-range cameras, face recognition, and the myriad other technologies that are increasingly in the hands of everyone.
Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.
Read CNNOpinion's Flipboard magazine.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49b510f2/sc/23/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A90Copinions0Cschneier0Eshoot0Edown0Edrones0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

What Facebook's 1 Billion Number Really Means


Dr. Sreedhar Potarazu, an ophthalmologist and entrepreneur, is the founder and CEO of VitalSpring Technologies Inc., a software company focused on providing employers with applications to aid in purchasing health care. He is the author of a book "Get Off The Dime: The Secret of Changing Who Pays For Your Health Care." The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN)Facebook reached an impressive milestone recently. CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on the platform that "For the first time ever, one billion people used Facebook in a single day.... 1 in 7 people on Earth used Facebook to connect with their friends and family."
Think about that for a moment. One billion people. That ain't chopped liver. Or Big Macs. That's one thousand million people -- more than three times the population of the United States -- on a single website on a single day.
The implications are enormous, and not only for Facebook. The number 1 billion represents how much everything has changed so fast in our world -- and how things will continue to change ever faster.
Facebook and a few other companies such as Uber, Google and Twitter are leveraging the power of social networking to fundamentally alter how people in the world communicate and exchange information. These companies are analyzing incredibly vast amounts of data every second that affect more than a billion people a day. And they're just getting started.
Just consider this:

Uber has created a platform that allows people to move from one location to another in 60 countries. Google allows us to find information on demand. When was the last time you visited a local library to look something up in a reference book? Facebook and Twitter enable us to correspond in real time not only with family, friends and coworkers, but with anyone in the world who has Internet access.

Whether you want to learn to play the banjo, smoke a brisket, train a dog, perform brain surgery, or attend college classes, everything you need to know is at your fingertips in the shortest period of time and in the most convenient way possible.

A personal computer ties us to a desk; a laptop ties us to a flat surface, even if it's our lap. But a smartphone goes in one hand and connects us to everyone and everything, everywhere, whether we're in Manhattan or Madagascar. This was impossible in all of human history except now. No wonder it has affected how we function in our daily lives.
As a news and information consumer, I count on Facebook and Twitter to keep me abreast of everything I need to know faster than television or radio ever did.
As a traveler, I count on Uber to deliver a car to my exact location and take me to my destination in less time than it takes me to hail a cab in rush hour.
And as a physician, I see how this sharing of massive amounts of data affects public health. We can predict health crises earlier, which allows us to react faster. Google, for example, has used its search engine to pinpoint where people are seeking information on the flu. That information enables medical personnel to identify outbreaks more quickly and to predict with great accuracy where the disease will spread.
The tech industry has profoundly reduced the distance and time between point A and point B in information sharing. And now it's conceivable to talk about huge numbers like a billion people.
If we look at health care, the implications are:
• We'll see more and better advances in disease treatment, because we'll be able to detect disease earlier.
• We'll be able to alert people to impending disasters, because we'll get information more quickly.
• We'll be able to provide treatment even to people in the most remote places in the world, thanks to the connectivity of the Internet.
But there are tradeoffs.
Privacy is one, because what people care or don't care to share is unpredictable. We also can't be sure that companies will want to share data. For example, a wearable device that contains data from millions of people might be able to predict that you are about to have a heart attack. But will the device's manufacturer share data with an ambulance service that automatically speeds to your rescue? Will your pharmacy share data with a company like Uber and send your prescription to your home instead of forcing you to come pick it up?
And who's going to pay for all this? These services don't come cheap, and neither do the smartphones that enable us to use them. The fact is, many people who need them can't afford them. Making the Internet available to everyone in the world is a great accomplishment only if everyone in the world can afford the device that connects to it. Will Apple, Samsung and the other smartphone manufacturers be willing to "dumb down" their smartphones to make them more affordable? Can they afford not to?
These are questions that will have to be answered soon, because the number 2 billion may be around the corner.
Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.
Read CNNOpinion's Flipboard magazine.




Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49943184/sc/15/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A30Copinions0Cpotarazu0Efacebook0Ebillion0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Has Stephen Hawking Solved The Mystery Of Black Holes?


Dr. Don Lincoln is a senior physicist at Fermilab who does research using the Large Hadron Collider. He has written numerous books and produces a series of science education videos. He is the author of, most recently, "The Large Hadron Collider: The Extraordinary Story of the Higgs Boson and Other Things that Will Blow Your Mind." Follow him on Facebook. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN)Black holes have a way of capturing our imagination. That's why when Stephen Hawking recently talked about them the media went wild.
But what was he really saying? Was it a breakthrough moment?
At the Hawking Radiation Conference organized by Laura Mersini-Houghton, a professor of physics at the University of North Carolina, 32 eminent physicists gathered to discuss outstanding issues involved with apparent contradictions in our current understanding of the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics. The convergence of the two take us to the inner workings of black holes.
Black holes are ravenous monsters of the cosmos, constantly reaching out and gobbling nearby mass as they grow larger and larger. The poster child of Einstein's theory of relativity, black holes exert such a strong gravitational force that not even light can escape, and they are able to distort the very fabric of space and slow the passage of time. These are very real objects.
And yet they embody a very significant mystery. Black holes are said to absorb matter and never let it go. The matter simply disappears inside the black hole. But matter is more than, well, matter. It is information. For instance, if I have a single atom of hydrogen, I have a proton and electron. That's matter. But there is also information in how they are connected. Are they near one another, or far apart?
The information component is even more important in, say, a piece of fruit. While I might tell you just how many protons, neutrons and electrons exist in an apple, without the information that tells you how they arranged, it wouldn't have the apple's tart taste. In fact, it wouldn't be an apple at all. Ultimately, it is information that is at the heart of the mystery.
According to the rules of quantum mechanics, information should never be lost, not even if it gets sucked inside the black hole. This is because of two premises: causality and reversibility. Taken together, it means that effects have causes, and those causes can be undone.
For example, you can break a glass and then find all the pieces and glue it back together. Yet, these two premises don't hold for a classical black hole, in which the information is permanently and irreversibly lost as it enters the black hole.
Note that information being lost isn't the same as matter being lost. In the 1970s, Hawking postulated what is now called Hawking radiation, which in principle, cause black holes eventually to evaporate as the radiation carries away energy. However, Hawking radiation should be completely independent of the matter absorbed by a black hole. So, information really does appear to be lost, in complete contradiction of quantum theory.
This is where Hawking's announcement comes in. He is saying that he can solve the conundrum.
He is countering the claim that the black hole gobbles and destroys the information by positing that the information never actually falls into the black hole. Instead, the information is held on the black hole's surface -- the event horizon.
This is an intriguing thought and is analogous to how holograms are made. Holograms are two-dimensional sheets of, for example, plastic that can make three-dimensional images. All of the information of three dimensions is encoded in the two dimensional plastic. (By the way, there are some who hypothesize that our entire universe is a hologram!)
It is difficult to properly evaluate Hawking's announcement. The claim as it has been described is not very precise. There is no paper published on the idea, nor has the idea passed peer review. In fact, scientists who attended the conference are still trying to absorb the idea and to cast it in a mathematical language so that the implication can be assessed.
Hawking developed this concept in collaboration with Malcolm Perry of Cambridge University and Andrew Strominger of Harvard University. They plan to submit a paper in a month or so. That's when the real evaluation of the proposal can begin.
While everyone would much prefer to hear about a definitive advancement in science, the actual process of developing scientific ideas can be both intellectually stimulating and thoroughly messy.
Stephen Hawking's new ideas are certainly interesting and may point us in the right direction. But we will have to wait a bit longer to solve the enigma of what happens when information confronts a black hole. Sit tight, we're on a very long journey.
Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.
Read CNNOpinion's Flipboard magazine.




Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/498b42f6/sc/3/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A30Copinions0Clincoln0Ehawking0Eblack0Eholes0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

World's Biggest Selfie To Be Taken In Australia


(CNN)The trouble with selfies... OK, one of the troubles with selfies, is it's so hard to see anything past that grimacing face bang, slap in the center.
Step forward Tourism Australia, which has come up with a new service for taking selfies in which the self is just one part of an epic widescreen landscape.
Mercifully, no selfie sticks are involved.
Giga Selfie, billed as the world's biggest selfie service, will be available on Australia's Gold Coast this weekend.
It uses a super high definition camera and cellphone technology to take photos big enough to accommodate even the most inflated egos.
Death by selfie? Russian police release brochure after spate of fatal accidents
Travelers using the service stand on a designated spot on the beach and use a "Giga Selfie" app -- only available on that day, on that spot -- on their smart phone to trigger a distant camera.
An enormous selfie is then emailed to them as a short video clip which starts as a close-up of their face and zooms out to reveal the surrounding scenery.

The gimmicky project is a part of a bigger campaign aimed at luring "a younger and social media savvy Japanese consumer."
"Gold Coast is one of the most popular and visited Australian destinations amongst the Japanese," Leo Seaton, TA's general manager in media and communications, tells CNN. "The beaches also provide an iconic backdrop for something like this."
The new global campaign will place more focus on Australia's aquatic and coastal experiences, adds Seaton.
Mars rover snaps new panoramic selfie
TA's managing director John O'Sullivan says Japan is key market for Australia's tourism sector, with Japenese visitors contributing $980 million annually.

Don't expect a gigantic selfie frenzy just yet though.
The special camera and lens -- 100 times more powerful than typical photo gear -- is only capable of snapping 10 giant shots per hour.
So posers might expect their photo to contain a long line of impatient faces stretching into the distance behind them.
Kim Kardashian: My selfies give me power
As yet, costs and logistics mean the service is only scheduled for deployment in the Gold Coast, although the promotional video includes multiple spots around Australia.
The future of the project will be determined after its debut.
Surfers Paradise, Gold Coast, September 5-6, 11 a.m.-4 p.m.

Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/498af18d/sc/23/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A20Ctravel0Caustralia0Egiga0Eselfie0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

How Small States Prepare For Cyber-war


Parag Khanna is a senior research fellow at the Centre on Asia and Globalisation at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore. His books include The Second World (2008) and How to Run the World (2011). The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN)With Russian tanks and rebels firmly lodged in eastern Ukraine, Eastern Europe has been on high alert for months. As Russian bombers intermittently skirt or trespass Western airspace -- and a foreign submarine was reported to be hiding out in waters just off Stockholm last year -- the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have ramped up expenditures on armored personnel carriers, mobile missile launchers and other hardware to defend their borders.
But the Baltic states are as fixated on their screens as their borders. Since Russia launched a major cyber-attack on Estonia in 2007 that crippled banks, broadcasters, and political parties, the smallest of the Baltic republics redoubled its efforts to secure electronically what geography dictates will always be at risk physically.
Citizens became instantly educated to protect their data; banks and telecoms cooperated and shared information. The phrase "whole of government" or "whole of society" has become a catchphrase in Washington, but is more of plea for bureaucracy to stop getting in its way.
On my recent trip to tiny Estonia, however, I witnessed the world's first truly cyber-ready society.
After famously gathering in public to sing its way to freedom from the Soviet Union in 1991, Estonia quickly reclaimed its Nordic and Hanseatic linkages, joining the EU, NATO and the eurozone. Necessity, not evolution, sparked Estonia's rapid metamorphosis from tiny post-Soviet republic into world-leading info-state, my term for countries at the forefront of achieving secure connectedness. Centuries of Russian subjugation, German invasion, and Soviet occupation created a messy record of who actual citizens were and the legitimacy of land titles.
Estonia decided to take advantage of Sweden and Finland's early lead in creating digital ID cards and databases and run with it, earning it the label that has stuck since native hero Skype became a global sensation: "E-Stonia."
In Tallinn, medieval buildings have been seamlessly augmented with ultramodern design and the latest digital fittings from electronic doors to motion-sensitive lights and ubiquitous Wi-Fi.
Today every single government transaction or service is performed online, from paying taxes to voting. ID cards are mandatory and issued to everyone at the age of 15, and almost the entire population of 1.3 million has one. This one card is a federal ID, driver's license, library card, and almost every other function rolled into one. But there is no risk in losing it -- or point in stealing one -- because it holds no data. Rather it has an embedded SIM card that holds an encrypted key that corresponds to an anonymized government code accessed by entering a PIN. Sound complicated? Estonians have no trouble deciphering the mechanics of the system since all public schools begin teaching coding at age seven.
Estonian officials mock countries where banks try to outmaneuver each other with flashy security tokens and other gimmicks rather than sharing basic protocols that allow individuals more flexibility. Because banks require more signatures than any other institution, bringing groups such as Swedbank that came on board early meant Estonia had its most important allies in pushing digitization through the country. Telecom operators such as Nortal also play their part both in communications and government services: All citizens get an encrypted SIM which they can insert into their mobile phones to access all the same features without even using a computer. Combining this distributed mobile technology with mandatory voting would create true digital democracy.
With all of Estonia's government agencies online, the society enjoys the growing efficiencies of machine-to-machine communication. Just one day spent enjoying Estonia's digital conveniences makes any visitor resentful of the bureaucratic nightmares found almost everywhere (except other info-states). In a world plagued by check fraud, Estonia has eliminated check. A digital signature supersedes a hand signature in a court of law. (Hand signatures have precisely one remaining symbolic use in Estonia: Marriage.) A lost ID can be replaced in 30 minutes rather than 30 days.
When I explained to Estonian officials about company stamps and inkpads, matching signatures at banks, and getting documents notarized, they looked at me as if I were an 18th century time-traveler wearing a wig. (This may also be because Estonia's prime minister is only 36.) Estonians have gone paperless to such an extreme that cabinet meetings are "BYOD": Bring Your Own Device. My floppy Moleskine notepad and pen were the only writing instruments I saw during my visit.

In small states, trusting data is a convenience; people can always go knock on the president's door (as they do in Estonia). Large states simply have no choice but to trust data -- and if done right, privacy protection can be remarkably simple to enforce. Estonia's X-Road system holds the data of government agencies, but distributes, anonymizes and encrypts its storage. Government employees can only access department specific data about a person, and every search query is logged. (No flashlights and combing through file cabinets with gloves on.) If you are pulled over by a policeman, he scans your ID and can only see your license, registration and insurance information; anything more requires a warrant and judicial grant. Data thus belongs to the public -- not the public administration.
The experiments and mistakes of small European countries inform the plans of their larger-scale associations. With the Nordic countries, Belgium, Portugal, Austria, Denmark and other small European countries all implementing various digital schemes, the EU has set out a Digital Strategy 2020 to harmonize its data systems and services, making itself a more seamless union for flows of people and services.
This midware connectivity among European data clouds is not digital welfare of the traditional European variety. Rather, it is the creation of a much larger eco-system in which a common technology platform enables companies and entrepreneurs to share digital X-rays for patients moving across countries, eliminate mobile phone roaming tariffs, and other steps that improve overall quality of life. Having already been through the experience of trading one currency for another, adding new countries to the economic and digital grid such as Moldova and Albania becomes a matter of snapping them on like small Lego pieces.
How can one of the world's smallest countries enlarge its digital footprint even further? At Ulemiste City, an integrated ICT campus near Tallinn's airport, offices are sprouting up to manage Estonia's latest cyber-venture, one as much diplomatic as social: E-citizenship. While Estonia has barely one million citizens, its nascent e-citizenship scheme could give it more than 10 million virtual ones by 2025: Investors and customers who take advantage of Estonia's 0% corporate income tax, professional e-commerce technicians, and legal access to the entire European Union. A friend of mine shuttling between San Francisco and Portland proudly touts her Estonian e-citizenship card as a portal to all her European clients.
In Estonia one experiences how lonely it is at the top of the digital heap. Its data security technicians have ideas for putting passports on mobile phones, but then they'd be the only ones to have it, rendering it useless ... for now.

Estonia still exhibits the vulnerabilities and strengths of being a small state next to a giant one. During World War II, its far larger cousin-state of Finland was only rendered geopolitically inert (hence "Finlandized"), while Estonia was occupied and subdued into the Soviet Union. In 2014, Russians jammed the virtual fence that serves as their border and snatched an Estonian federal agent. Even with broadband speeds faster than South Korea, Estonia cannot escape its geography.
Still, the country is taking steps to protect everything that isn't dug into the Earth such as creating a cyber-defense league of government supported volunteer IT specialist units -- a virtual version of the fully armed Swiss populace, assigning itself to various quadrants of Estonia's critical infrastructure the way Swiss know which borders they are assigned to defend if communications are shut down. If the government's secure sites are fully exposed or hacked, it can de-activate all tokens through a "red button" style kill switch and reassign all national ID numbers and pins afterwards.
The "Emergency Act" also requires that over three-dozen institutions from banks to grocery stores have back-up strategies to provide the population with necessary cash and supplies should there be a digital shutdown. Cyber-attacks have replaced nuclear war as the daily risk -- and reality -- of geopolitical life. Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) has become the new Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST).
Knowing all too well that they could one day again wake up occupied and potentially exiled, Estonians have come up with novel solutions every diaspora group could use to better organize themselves. Besides their embassies and ambassadorial residences abroad, Estonians have also set-up sovereign "data embassies" in secure locations abroad to which they back-up their national data so they can reconstitute as a virtual, post-territorial nation should the need arise. The virtual country would remain alive even if the physical country becomes inaccessible.
The best defense a small info-state has against an overwhelming physical mismatch is digital deterrence. Estonia now hosts NATO's Cyber-Defense Unit, and gathered over a dozen NATO allies in early 2015 for operation "Locked Shield," a training exercise to ward against attacked emanating through operating systems such as Microsoft Windows. Recent history demonstrates that hacks come from many sources -- but especially Russia, China and North Korea -- and target government and high-value corporate data as well.
In July 2015, Estonia also became a founding member of the world's first formal cyber-alliance known as the "Digital Five" alongside the UK, South Korea, Israel and New Zealand -- disparate but advanced countries agreeing to securely host each other's servers. Note that the Digital Five isn't named after a place or geography; it's neither North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) nor Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). It's not a geographic alliance but a geodesic one.
Countries don't have to share a border to become more functionally integrated. Indeed, one of the fastest growing categories of trade isn't between any two particular regions, but between governments themselves as they seek to outsource -- or insource -- the best practices from their peers. States increasingly contract services from each other such as energy supplies, currencies, military protection, port facilities, airlines, telecoms, postal services and satellite launches. Eurozone countries have outsourced their central banking to Frankfurt, Morocco places substantial military forces in the UAE to defend it against terrorism, Finland is building an LNG terminal on the Baltic Sea that Estonia will share to cut both of their reliance on Russian gas, and so forth.
The Digital Five is an early stage info-state alliance reminiscent of the medieval Hanseatic League, a maritime federation of northern European city-states that resisted encroachment from Europe's monarchies, refusing allegiance to any overlord in favor of open trade and political autonomy. The inter-city Hanseatic world declined with the rise of sovereign princely states and the 1648 Peace of Westphalia, but in the emerging world of increasingly autonomous city-regions, a postmodern Hanseatic League is rising again, continuing the heritage of maritime connectivity but adding all the new technologies info-states have mastered.

Most small countries pose little military threat to their larger neighbors. Rather, they must concentrate on building financial firepower through currency reserves, wealth funds and foreign investment to boost in economic geography what they lack in political geography. Like Switzerland, they need to be connected to the world but not overly integrated, lest they lose their competitive advantages.
Short of nuclear deterrence, most info-states have little physical defense against the potential military encroachment of larger powers. Israel stands out as having a nuclear arsenal, fortified borders, a world-class military as well as robust cyber-capabilities, while Switzerland and Singapore maintain strict border protections, aerial superiority, and constantly train for ground combat operations as well. All three now have trained units of hackers and drone pilots for offense and defense operations.
The digital Hanseatic League has become a robust marketplace of innovative knowledge sharing. There are countless examples already of how leading city-states direct adopt lessons and practices from each other's recent experience. Singapore has studied the planning of London's underground subway expansion before its next major underground lines are developed, the requirements for women in Israel and Switzerland's national service programs, and how Bilbao has turned former manufacturing districts into thriving artistic hubs. Dubai has already been imitating Singapore's e-government services for customs, immigration and police functions. Singapore also guides other city-states not just in governance effectiveness but the pursuit of national self-sufficiency through its construction of oil storage depots wastewater recycling facilities. Singapore is doing whatever it can to survive should its connectivity be switched off.
The case of Hong Kong, however, reminds me of the vulnerability that comes from proximity to a major power. Though Hong Kong has a special history as a Chinese territory, its more than one century as a thriving and open British colonial enclave set the conditions for it to become a top-tier info-state perennially ranked as one of the world's most free, entrepreneurial and dynamic societies. Since the 1997 handover of the island back to China, however, Hong Kong has experienced a steady erosion of its autonomy. Beijing has sought to unilaterally dictate Hong Kong's political structure and leadership, manipulate its history books, diminish its press freedom, and take control of many companies, all the while undermining the unique positioning of its port as Shenzhen's grows, setting up a rival free trade zone in Shanghai, polluting its air with mainland factory smog, and crowding it with hordes of mainland tourists, workers and child-bearing women, and encouraging more talent and cash to seep out to Vancouver. The substantial narrowing of Victoria harbor through land reclamation is a metaphor for how Hong Kong is being swallowed by China, absorbed into the empire as the southern tip of the giant Pearl River Delta urban archipelago.
The sometimes brutal crackdown on the 2014 "Umbrella Revolution" in Hong Kong made clear that China has time on its side and resistance would be futile. At the same time, Hong Kong is evidence of the rupture from an age of empires trading territories to one where even small and vulnerable cities will fight to maintain urban autonomy even if they can't be independent. As I clamored through the throngs of 50,000 protestors in October 2014, I saw all the elements that make a sustained urban occupation possible from portable power generators to small drones, fast food and fresh fruit, and mesh-net Wifi and Bluetooth coordination apps. Hong Kong and the mainland may be growing together physically, but they are growing apart politically due to devolutionary pressure and generational change.
From Hong Kong to Estonia, a technologically empowered digital rallying cry can be heard across the world's smartest small nations: "Info-states of the world, unite!"


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/498312bc/sc/33/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A20Copinions0Cestonia0Ecyber0Ewar0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

China, Russia Amassing Personal Info Seized In Hacks For Counter-intelligence


Washington (CNN)Chinese and Russian intelligence services are collecting personally identifiable information on a grand scale so they can target American government workers for counter-intelligence, a U.S. official told CNN Tuesday.
China has been particularly active, the official said, part of a national strategy to target the U.S.
The foreign spy agencies use a massive database analysis to combine and cross-reference information obtained from cyberattacks on targets ranging from the Office of Personnel Management to the cheating website Ashley Madison to identify and potentially compromise operatives.
"Individually, the OPM breach and the Ashley Madison breach both present significant dangers to U.S. personnel, including intelligence personnel, but taken together, they really ratchet up the level of harm," said Marc Zwillinger, a lawyer handling data breach and privacy cases. "The OPM breach has confidential information about U.S. personnel and people that have applied for security clearances, and the Ashley Madison breach reveals people's most intimate secrets about the affairs they might be having, and together, it provides a lot of leverage that could be used to blackmail and possibly influence U.S. personnel."

Both Russia and China use non-government entities, including hacking groups and private companies, to infiltrate U.S. systems and analyze the collected data. The intention, the U.S. official says, is to hide the true source of the attacks. However, the U.S. official says both governments also carry out cyberattacks using their own assets and attempt to cover their tracks using other methods.
Such cyberattacks have been on a gradual upswing since the mid-2000s due in large part to their success, the official said. The Obama administration has repeatedly acknowledged the threat.
"We're confronting a persistent and dedicated adversary. The threat is ever-evolving. And it is critically important for us to make sure that our defensive measures that are intended to prevent these kinds of intrusions reflect that ever-evolving risk," White House press secretary Josh Earnest said in June.
Cybersecurity: How safe are you?

However, internal reports have repeatedly found that U.S. government systems remain vulnerable. Many U.S. government agencies still lack urgency in addressing the problem, leaving U.S. systems open to further attacks. The U.S. official described as "likely" the prospect of additional successful cyberattacks on sensitive U.S. government systems.
"What the OPM breach really revealed is that government cybersecurity isn't even up to the par of the private sector, and the private sector suffers security breaches all the time," said Zwillinger. "So it's a wake-up call both for the government networks and commercial networks."
Some lawmakers, as well as current and former intelligence officials, have spoken about the possibility of retaliatory attacks raising the costs on states targeting the U.S.
"We need to do a better job of protecting our systems. The best offense is a good defense. But I also think we can go beyond that and explore ways to deter future attacks," California Rep. Adam Schiff said Tuesday.
Opinion: Ashley Madison hack: Privacy becomes extinct

Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/498233c0/sc/7/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C0A10Cpolitics0Cchina0Erussia0Ecyberattacks0Emilitary0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

How Disaster Technology Is Saving Lives


Watch "Katrina: The Storm that Never Stopped" Thursday at 9 p.m. ET/PT.
(CNN)Robots with cameras, microphones and sensors searched for victims stranded in flooded homes and on rooftops. They assessed damage and sent back images from places rescuers couldn't get.
It was August 31, 2005, two days after Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast. These robots were a crucial connection between emergency responders and survivors.
Ten years later, the technology, and how humans interact with it, has only improved. New technology is changing the way we handle whatever life throws at us. In the case of disaster relief and recovery, this means more effective ways to save lives and begin the arduous process of rebuilding after catastrophe.
"You've got a golden 72 hours of the initial response that's very critical," said Dr. Robin Murphy, who worked with robots after the September 11, 2001, attacks, in natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and at the Fukushima nuclear accident.
"Then you have the restoration of services. After the emergency teams have got everything under control, you got to get your power back on, your sewage, you know, your roads and that."
Murphy, a robotics professor and director of the Center for Robot-Assisted Search and Rescue (CRASAR) at Texas A&M University, sees special potential and value in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones.
"It acts like a plane. It's smarter than a plane because it's got all sorts of onboard electronics to let it do preprogram surveys. It takes pictures like on a satellite or a Mars explorer and then pulls those back together into a hyper-accurate map -- a 3-D reconstruction," Murphy said.
UAVs such as the PrecisionHawk Lancaster, a fixed wing drone, are not only able to aide human disaster responders by providing photos of where to look for victims, but they also provide a valuable resource for determining how to approach the relief efforts.
Murphy said it's not only very accurate, but it's also easy to pick up and maneuver.
What's more, the robots can help multiple relief efforts at once. One group may be using the UAF to search for survivors, while at the same time another organization can use different data to check their models of flooding in the storm surge or radiation levels, and update that information to provide guidance to still other groups and teams aiding in the relief and recovery efforts. The more the drones are used, the more researchers can learn about how to improve them.
"We go participate in disasters to learn. You can't really tell how the technology's going to be used until you use it. You can't use the technology until it's there. It's kind of a cycle," said Murphy.
But as UAV technology becomes more intuitive to human operators and ubiquitous in everyday life, its use in disasters is threatened. Murphy calls it "disaster tourism" when amateur drone pilots -- often incorrectly believing they are helping -- get in the way of relief and rescue efforts.
"They don't know what to look for. They don't know how to get the data," Murphy said. "You've got a lot of high-resolution imagery of people's property and stuff that you're flying over," in addition to causing clutter in the sky. Murphy and CRASAR don't go into disaster areas until agencies contact them directly and ask for help.
"It's a matter of getting (the data) into the hands of the responders, figuring out who needs what data in what form, when do they need it, and how they're going to get it. And these issues of privacy, security, how do you train people? What are the protocols?"
While UAVs cruise the sky, other robots do groundwork. RoboSimian is a highly dexterous robot that can be deployed in the field, meaning it can actually go into a real disaster environment and work. It can scan for objects and assess the situation, and when it gets there, with its four seven-degree-of-freedom limbs, it can actually manipulate its surroundings -- turn a valve, pick up a drill, do things that a human would be able to do, but can't because of the risk.
"A great example of that would be the Fukushima disaster-- where there was radiation. It was extremely dangerous for humans to go in. And what would have been really great is if we could have sent robots in to do something as simple as turn a valve," said Kyle Edelberg, a robotics engineer with NASA-JPL.
Unfortunately, when the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, damaging the Fukushima 1 Nuclear Power Plant, robot technology was not yet at a place to be able to do that.
While RoboSimian is a workhorse, crawling on its front limbs like a robotic ape, it generally moves at a slow and steady pace. So, when time is of the essence, and people are trapped in rubble and stranded in disaster situations a different technology must be deployed -- FINDER. FINDER stands for Finding Individuals for Disaster and Emergency Response.
FINDER uses low-power radar to detect the small movements from breathing and the heartbeat of a buried victim, even though several feet of rubble and debris.
The technology is managed by Jim Lux, of JPL, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Lux explains the deceptively simple idea behind how FINDER works by sending the low-power radio signal which reflects off the debris being searched.
"The reflection from the rubble doesn't move. So it's not changing. But the reflection from the victim is moving because their heartbeat, it changes a little bit. We look for those tiny changes and then determine if they're from a human," Lux said.
When disaster strikes, scientists hope these robots and others technologies can help in the effort to rescue survivors and -- as humans always do -- recover and rebuild.
CNN's Meridith Edwards contributed to this report.
Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/493fc3ec/sc/28/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A80C240Cus0Crobot0Edisaster0Etechnology0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Facebook 'dislike' Button A Comeback For Negative Thinking


Andre Spicer is a professor of organizational behavior at Cass Business School, City University London. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN)We have all had the experience of being gagged by the "like" button on Facebook. As we scroll through our news feed, we sometimes come across stories that trigger loathing, sadness or even rage. But all we have is a like button. Sure, we can write a long message in the comment field. But there is no button to instantly express negative emotions.
That is about to change. Facebook has announced it will create a "dislike button." Only last year, Mark Zuckerberg said, "Some people have asked for a dislike button because they want to be able to say 'that thing isn't good,' and we're not going to do that ... I don't think that's socially very valuable, or great for the community."
Now, Zuckerberg has admitted that "not every moment is good" and perhaps a dislike button isn't such a bad idea after all.
Zuckerberg may have changed his mind, but many other people have not. Some think the dislike button will toxify relationships. Others fear it will fuel bullying and other kinds of aggressive behavior online. But the biggest worry is the button will "actively foster negativity."
It seems we have become so fragile that any sign of negativity -- even a simple thumbs down on a social media website -- is something that must be avoided at all costs. All we want is a constant stream of thumbs up. The slightest sign someone might disagree with us is enough to send us into an emotional tailspin.
One of the most insidious ideas of our time is positive thinking. It's drilled into many of us: think positive, don't think negative. It's no wonder people find the prospect of the dislike button so worrisome.
People are constantly told to be upbeat, even in the face of horrible situations. Sick people are told to stay positive and think about their illness as a "gift." The unemployed are advised to ban all negative words (like "unemployed") and even stop reading the news (too much negativity there). When an entrepreneur fails, he is told to see it as "step forward." And of course we can only "like" things on Facebook.
Being positive certainly comes with benefits. But research is starting to reveal that all this upbeat thinking has some big downsides. When we are unable to express negative feelings, many human emotions become off limits. We avoid taking a realistic look at problems, which means we overlook risks and do stupid things. Those who don't feel on top of the world start to think there is something seriously wrong with them. Those in an upbeat mood tend to be more selfish and feel more socially disconnected. What is even more surprising is that people told to think positively often end up feeling worse.
As we start to recognize the limits of always looking on the bright side, negative thinking is making a comeback.
It's not just Facebook that will allow you to dislike things. Some companies have started to support their employees in pointing out problems. One particularly interesting method that firms are using to avoid the mistakes made by our bias toward positive thinking is the "pre-mortem."
It works like this: When we begin a project we largely focus on the bright side. As a result, we think the project will take half as long and cost half as much as it actually does. By doing a pre-mortem, we try to think as negatively as possible and identify anything that might go wrong. When people engage in this kind of negative thinking, they tend to spot flaws and fix them before they become a problem.
Maybe, if used well, the "dislike" button could become a kind of early warning system in our own lives. It will allow us to see where we are going wrong, think a little more realistically, and avoid being blinded by our own optimism.
Living with the thumbs down will be tough. We may get upset, be disturbed and sometimes feel gloomy. Excessive negativity can easily become bullying. But having a space to share our negative feelings every now and then can help us own up to the many problems that we face, and hopefully, deal with them in a levelheaded way.
Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.
Read CNNOpinion's Flipboard magazine.



Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4a0b2f94/sc/15/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C170Copinions0Cspicer0Efacebook0Edislike0Ebutton0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

The Rise Of The Virtual Runway


Pandora is the fashion features editor at The Sunday Times Style
(CNN)In the four years since she launched her eponymous womenswear label in New York, Misha Nonoo has gained a place on the CFDA's prestigious Fashion Incubator scheme, been featured on Forbes 30 Under 30 List and garnered celebrity fans such as Emma Watson and Gwyneth Paltrow.
Now the Bahrain-born and British-raised Nonoo can add another string to her global, savvy young bow. For SS16, Nonoo is the pioneer of the "insta-show."
On September 12th during New York Fashion Week, Nonoo became the first designer to present her collection exclusively on Instagram, under the specially created handle @mishanonoo_show. With the sideways scroll function forming a miniature runway, for this show, everyone could sit on the FROW.
"The runway has worked for decades and I think it continues to work very well for certain designers" says Nonoo. "But with digital, there are so many new opportunities that do not have any geographical limitations, timing conflicts or seating restrictions. And that's what I am motivated by."
(At the time of writing, the handle had a little over 3,000 followers. Not a huge amount; but many will have undoubtedly unfollowed the account once the show finished.)
Nonoo is one of the industry's savviest young designers, but she's not the only one to apply digital tactics to the runway concept. In collaboration with PR team KCD's Digital Fashion Shows platform, British designer Zoe Jordan streamed her show online, on September 10th.
Reviews of the concept are thin on the ground (perhaps more so than if she had parlayed her collection in the typical format) but Jordan says "it has been really positively received. It's evergreen content and my virtual shop window. It definitely seems part of the cultural zeitgeist this season!"
Nothing, of course, is more zeitgeisty than Instagram. It's "the place where fashion unfolds during the fashion week circuit" says Eva Chen, Instagram's newly appointed head of fashion partnerships (and something of an Insta-celeb herself.)
During fashion week, said photo app is full of "samey, blurry runway pictures." Instagram's solution is the InstaShoot. Hosted by fashion houses themselves, they are presentations specifically created for Instagram. Stella McCartney and Calvin Klein have both produced their own InstaShoots, with an impressive roster of other designers in the works: Prabal Garang, Proenza Schouler, Rodarte, Marc Jacobs and Moschino.
InstaShoots have not yet been used by brands in lieu of a runway show -- currently they are designed to compliment. But they could be the solution for a young brand who wishes to start with just a capsule collection (and a smaller budget.)
"I think everyone in fashion can acknowledge that the current fashion show set up isn't sustainable, or conducive to creativity" says Lou Stoppard, the editor of SHOWStudio, photographer Nick Knight's fashion film website. "Journalists and buyers now spend practically their whole year trekking around the world what with the rise of cruise/resort shows."
It's a salient point; during the SS16 fashion month alone, there are 439 shows and presentations (and that's not including the emerging fashion hubs like Copenhagen, Sydney, Stockholm etc.)
"The current system also fetishizes four cities -- Paris, New York, Milan, London -- which doesn't fit with the global fashion landscape."
Stoppard believes the drive towards online correlates directly with the way we shop. "So much fashion is bought online, without physical cloth being touched, it's hardly revolutionary to suggest it is shown or debuted online also."
Several things need to be addressed before this happens on a larger scale, however. "If brands are going to show in a purely digital form they need to have the option for their fans to buy straight away -- the six months lag before clothes are available doesn't make sense to shoppers."
This is something Topshop Unique configured for their SS15 show, where a few select looks, different to those on the runway, were shown on Facebook -- with a click to buy feature. This isn't something they repeated for AW15, so it's hard to surmise its success.
It's not a case of either/or, argues Caroline Issa, the CEO of Tank magazine and consultancy. Runway shows have been around in some sort of form for 70 odd years. As Chen puts it, "the creation of live streaming hasn't replaced runway shows." Rather, the answer may be a combination of multi-platform channels. A case of pick and mix, if you will. The fact remains that for many in the industry, an all-singing, all-dancing runway is still the optimum.
"I don't think Chanel, or Dior, or Prada, will ever just stream a show" says Issa, decisively.
Consultant and co-founder of fashion brand être cécile, Yasmin Sewell agrees.
"Is there ever going to be anything as wonderful as the truly sensory experience of a visionary fashion show? I'm all for progression, but those traditions are really where the essence of fashion lies. Can anything really be more 'fashion' than a Paris runway?"
Some believe that if runway shows are to be replaced by anything, it will be the static presentation.
"It makes sense for big brands to do big epic shows" reasons Lulu Kennedy, graduate showcase initiative Fashion East's founder, "but you have to think about how it will look on Instagram. Everyone loves a presentation because buyers get to see the clothes up close, instead of them whizzing past and the model bill is effectively halved."
It isn't just the digital platforms, or the fashion cognoscenti, who are precipitating this change. The power for change in fact lies with the customer.
"The market is more consumer-led than it has ever been" says Sewell. "For so long, the power has been with the press, but these days the customer can make or break your brand. There are a whole wave of brands that may get no support from major publications but who have managed to self-create huge hype and demand for their product through digital platforms and their global online following."
As Chen summarizes "the velvet rope has been pulled away from fashion. Instagram makes everything truly accessible." For some brands, the question that remains is not what city they will show in; but if they will show -- in physical form -- at all?


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4a0b2f92/sc/14/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C170Cfashion0Cdigital0Efuture0Eof0Efashion0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Does Tinder's New 'Super Like' Make You Look Too Keen?


Eileen Chu and Stefano Verrelli are psychology researchers at the University of Sydney, Australia. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the authors. CNN is showcasing the work of The Conversation, a collaboration between journalists and academics to provide news analysis and commentary. The content is produced solely by The Conversation.
SydneyIn the search for love, the conventional wisdom would have us believe that playing hard to get is a winning move.
Indeed, previously in online dating, sending a simple "Like" was enough to allow singles to subtly express their interest, akin to admiring from afar but only ever making eye contact across the room.
But the online dating app Tinder has recently taken this to a whole new level with the release of a new feature called the "Super Like". By hitting the Super Like button, you are cutting to the chase, with Tinder's CEO and co-founder Sean Rad saying: "Super Like is more like going up to someone and saying 'hello'."
But is allowing people to be upfront and brazen online the best way to find true love?

Research suggests that when rating potential suitors online, women are particularly attracted to a man when they are 100% certain that he likes them back.
In psychology, this is known as reciprocity. Put simply, we like people who like us -- and by the same token, we should Super Like those who Super Like us, right?
Not necessarily.
This research has also found that when women are kept in the dark about whether or not a man is interested, they find him even more attractive. This is because uncertainty breeds rumination -- keeping your cards close to your chest increases how much people think about you and arouses their curiosity.
So while Tinder's Super Like was designed to help users avoid beating around the bush, according to the science, it may actually be better to hold back and appear more aloof.
But it can't be that simple, can it?

Arguably, another feature of online dating that attracts the time poor and forlorn is its accessibility and the abundance of choice. But research indicates that when inundated with options, such as hundreds of potential mates, we are less likely to commit and more likely to remain unsatisfied with our choices.
A recent study found that playing hard to get is only an effective strategy when there is mutual romantic interest and investment. But in online dating, the surplus of perceived choice generally makes people noncommittal, especially in the early stages.
Alternatively, declaring one's eagerness upfront can heighten feelings of romantic attraction, even if the target of our affections is not initially interested. So when dating online, it seems that sending a Super Like may be the way to go after all.
So when looking for a relationship online, do you Super Like or not? Well, the answer might also depend on who is making the first move.

One commonly held belief in dating is that men should be upfront and make the first move, but according to research, the Super Like may actually be less effective for them.
The results from another recent study found that women are suspicious if a man is initially too keen. This is because women are more likely to interpret a man's over-enthusiasm as simply a strategy used for personal (usually sexual) gain.
On the other hand, in the first stages of dating, men generally prefer to be sure that they are in with a good chance. From a man's perspective, women who are clearly keen and responsive are seen to be more feminine, and therefore more attractive.
Based on this evidence, it is women who may benefit from being more forward and sending out a Super Like to initiate conversation online. In contrast, men should be more reticent and extra cautious when using the new function.

On the topic of courting, Mark Twain once wrote: "When you fish for love, bait with your heart, not with your brain."
Drawn from popular belief, baiting with your heart may not completely hurt your chances at love. Indeed, every year, thousands of people around the globe, do manage to find love online.
But online dating isn't always simply common sense. Understanding the science of attraction can further improve your chances. The question of whether to Super Like or not requires knowing how, when, where and why Cupid's arrow will hit or miss.

Copyright 2015 The Conversation. Some rights reserved.

Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4a0b2f91/sc/14/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C180Copinions0Ctinder0Eonline0Edating0Esuper0Elike0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Prosthetic Hand 'tells' The Brain What It Is Touching



(CNN)Research on prosthetic hands has come a long way, but most of it has focused on improving the way the body controls the device.
Now, it may also be possible for prosthetic hands to send signals back to the body and "tell" it information about what the bionic hand is touching, according to a new study.
Recently, researchers at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the research arm of the U.S. military, implanted an array of small electrodes into the region of the brain that controls movement in a woman who is paralyzed. The electrodes communicated electrical activity from the brain's motor cortex, via wires, to a prosthetic arm that the woman was able to move through a wide range of motions.
Then the research team asked, "Can we run the experiment in reverse? Can we do for sensation what we did for the motor system?" said Justin Sanchez, program manager of the DARPA biological technologies office, in a presentation he gave on Thursday at the Wait, What? A Future Technology Forum, which DARPA hosted in St. Louis.
To answer this question, the researchers worked with a 28-year-old man who is paralyzed. They implanted an electrode array in both his motor cortex and sensory cortex, the brain region that recognizes tactile sensations such as texture and pressure. Wires from the motor cortex array controlled the hand, as they did for the female volunteer, and sensors in the hand also conveyed information, via another set of wires, back to the array in the sensory cortex.
The researchers showed that this feedback system allowed the hand to communicate directly with the brain. In a video included in Sanchez's presentation, a researcher blindfolded the man and then gently pressed on different fingertips in the prosthetic hand. The volunteer was able to identify which fingertip was being touched with "nearly 100 % accuracy" even without seeing it, according to a DARPA press release about the research.
People who have prosthetic hands today rely on being able to see what the hand is doing to control it, said Sliman Bensmaia, an associate professor of neuroscience at the University of Chicago. But people will never be able to use these hands with dexterity until they can feel what they are doing without looking at them, he said. Bensmaia did preliminary research for Sanchez's team on how to make the electrode array work in the sensory cortex.
"On the short term, you want to know whether you are touching an object, and how much pressure you are exerting on it, those basic things that you need to hold things," Bensmaia said. But as the technology progresses, touch sensors may also be able to convey temperature and texture, he added.
Although the current demonstration is the first of a prosthetic hand directly communicating with the brain, other researchers have demonstrated that they can send messages from sensors in the prosthetic hand to electrodes implanted in nerves in the arm that then communicate with the brain.
"(However), in situations where people have spinal cord injury, so they are quadriplegic ... you probably couldn't give them sensation back through the nerves," because they have lost the use of the nerves in their arm, said Dr. Paul S. Cederna, professor of plastic surgery and biomedical engineering at the University of Michigan.
Devices on the market now rely on either body power, in which a healthy part of the body controls the prosthetic through cables and harnesses, or myoelectric devices, in which electrical signals from muscles attached to the prosthetic control it.
Researchers are also working on developing highly sensitive prosthetic arms that can recreate nearly every motion of a real arm, and bionic hands that can be controlled through an iPhone.
The big benefit of Sanchez's approach is being able to use prostheses for people with spinal cord injuries, Cederna said. The 28-year-old man in the current demonstration has been paralyzed for more than a decade because of a spinal cord injury.
Although Cederna was not involved in Sanchez's research, he conducts DARPA-funded research on how to improve control of prosthetic devices through peripheral nerves, such as those in the arm.
The idea of implanting an electrode array into the brain to either control or receive signals from a prosthetic limb is big step forward, but it is not ready for prime time yet. "The biggest challenge, once you put that electrode into the brain, you develop scarring around the electrode, and that makes it increasingly difficult to pick up the signals it needs to pick up," Cederna said.
Researchers are working hard to develop electrode arrays that work for longer periods of time, Bensmaia said. Currently electrode arrays in the motor cortex only work for a few years, although arrays in the sensory cortex appear to be more stable, he added.
Amputees fight Medicare proposal to limit prosthetics


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49e01955/sc/28/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C150Chealth0Cprosthetic0Ehand0Esenses0Etouch0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

They're Here! New Horizons' Best Shots Of Pluto



(CNN)A range of majestic mountains meets with endless plains. On Pluto, billions of miles from the sun's reach, they are likely both made of ice.
And this week, we are seeing close-ups of them with unprecedented clarity. Finally, two months after the New Horizons spacecraft flew by the dwarf planet at close range, new higher resolution images have arrived.
It has taken that long for NASA to download them. The transfer speed of data from the spacecraft at 2,000 bits per second makes an old dial-up modem with its 56,000 bits per second look like a speed demon.
It will take NASA a year to transfer all the photos and data. The dump began arriving over the Labor Day weekend. Some of the pictures that NASA released were not single snapshots but compilations synthesized from multiple photos.
Judging by the first, crisp digital close-up images, the wait was worth it. They reveal a planet not frozen in place but with a complex landscape still developing.
Pluto probe gets new assignment

The photos taken from New Horizons' closest approach of Pluto on July 14 -- at about 50,000 million miles away -- reveal some surprises.
For example, there may even be dunes blown up by winds. But that would seem impossible on a planet with barely an atmosphere.
"Seeing dunes on Pluto -- if that is what they are -- would be completely wild, because Pluto's atmosphere today is so thin," said astronomer William B. McKinnon from Washington University in St. Louis.
"Either Pluto had a thicker atmosphere in the past, or some process we haven't figured out is at work. It's a head-scratcher."
And those gargantuan blocks of ice the size of mountains might be floating in flows of frozen nitrogen.
The spacecraft also picked up nice images of Pluto's moons. Photos of Charon -- the largest one -- reveal a mammoth crack, a tectonic fracture.
Mind-blowing Pluto has ice mountains and water


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/49c66e1b/sc/23/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A90C110Cus0Cpluto0Enew0Ehorizons0Ephotos0Edata0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

5 Things To Know About The Next IPhone



(CNN)It's that time of year again. The kids are back in school, the nights are getting cooler, footballs are flying through the air and Apple is readying new iPhones.
The company just announced it will hold an event September 9 in San Francisco. And while Apple is tighter with its secrets than the CIA, a new generation of iPhones -- which have been birthed every September or October since 2011 -- are a safe bet.
Here's what to expect from the ninth generation of Apple's flagship device.

If recent patterns hold, the phone will be called iPhone 6S -- assuming it's a relatively modest upgrade over last year's iPhone 6. But if Apple overhauls the handset, it may ditch the odd-year "S" naming convention and call it iPhone 7.
There's a perception among some consumers that the "S" models aren't as desirable as the others. And Apple may eventually choose to drop the numbers and letters entirely ("iPhone 19S" doesn't have a great ring to it).
Until then, we're betting on iPhone 6S.

Reports suggest that after enlarging the device several times in recent years, Apple will retain the same display size as last year's phones -- a 4.7-inch diagonal screen for the regular model and 5.5 inches for the Plus model. But the new phones may be slightly thicker.
According to the Wall Street Journal, whose Apple sources are usually reliable, the physical design will remain unchanged.
Apple will fix iPhone 6 Plus phones that take blurry photos

Apple made a splash several years ago when it broadened its black-and-white iPhone palette to include gold, silver and "space gray."
Apple blog 9to5Mac says Apple this year is set to add a new color: rose gold, which means a coppery hue. The Apple Watch comes in that color.

Apple typically begins selling new iPhones in the United States a week or so after they're unveiled, and always on a Friday. For example, the iPhone 6 went on sale 10 days after last year's launch event.
So the first day you'll likely be able to get your mitts on a new iPhone will be September 18.
How to get the best cell phone deals

As usual, Apple will pack the new phones with a faster processor and an improved camera. Reports say the next cameras will boast 12 megapixels (they're 8 megapixels now) and 4K video recording.
But the biggest new feature, and the one Apple will be promoting most, will likely be something called Force Touch.
Already in use on the Apple Watch, Force Touch uses tiny electrodes around the display that can distinguish between a light tap and a deep press. Users can tap the screen to open an app or press down firmly to access a new range of additional controls.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/495f0e98/sc/15/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A80C270Ctech0Capple0Enext0Eiphone0Efeat0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Floyd Mayweather Pulls Up To Work In $4.8M Hypercar



(CNN)When your nickname is "Money," turning up to work in a $4.8 million car represents just another day in the office.
No stranger to flashing the cash in the past, Floyd Mayweather this week unveiled the latest addition to his multi-million collection of motors -- the Koenigsegg CCXR Trevita.
Billed as a "hypercar" -- supposedly superior to a supercar -- it was the 38-year-old's chosen mode of transport for his journey to the Mayweather Boxing Club Wednesday for his latest training session ahead of his September 12 fight against Andre Berto at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.
Mayweather -- ranked by Forbes as the world's highest-paid athlete -- claims to own one of only two models ever made by the Swedish company Koenigsegg, which he refers to as "an ultra boutique automobile manufacturer for the super rich."
If pulling up to work in a $4.8 million car was not a big enough declaration of his wealth for Mayweather, he then proceeded to park his new toy alongside his three Bugatti Veyrons and a white Ferrari before heading inside to train.
The five cars of Mayweather's on show outside of his boxing club are believed to be worth a total of $10.6 million.
Mayweather's bout against Berto -- his first since seeing off Manny Pacquiao in the richest fight in boxing history in May -- is said to be his last, with the 38-year-old, who has never lost as a professional, having previously said he will retire afterward.


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4957c719/sc/7/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A80C270Csport0Cfloyd0Emayweather0E40E80Emillion0Ecar0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

Flamethrowers Spark Second Amendment Debate



(CNN)The debate over the Second Amendment has gone up in flames in Michigan.
The City Council of Warren, a suburb of Detroit, is debating an ordinance that would ban the assembly, storage and use of -- flamethrowers?
Yep, flamethrowers.
Resident Chris Byars figured people had seen flamethrowers in movies and video games, and maybe they'd want one of their own. So he designed a commercially available flamethrower for public purchase, and raised nearly four times his goal on a crowdfunding site.
Byars' company, Ion Productions Team, completes the assembly of the devices in town, but Warren Mayor Jim Fouts wants to change that.
Fouts is working with the City Council to pass an ordinance to outlaw "the assembly, storage and use of flamethrowers" in Warren, calling the devices "terrorist machines" and disasters waiting to happen.
"We cannot wait until a tragedy occurs," Fouts said. "If you sell this en masse ... you face a potential catastrophic event occurring."
Fouts argues that, unlike firearms, which are unavailable to people with a criminal record or mental health issues, flamethrowers face no such restrictions.
Byars, however, argues that for the mayor "to ban ownership of an object because it frightens him is ridiculous."
"I'm a fan of personal freedom and personal responsibility," Byars said. "If someone does something dangerous with an object, blame the person, not the object."
Fouts said this goes beyond a Second Amendment issue. "There is no Second Amendment right to a weapon of mass destruction, as this is."
The mayor continued, "I respect your Second Amendment rights, but this is something you don't need to own."
Byars said the increased media attention has led to sales of his flamethrowers doubling -- though "nobody's ordered one in Warren."


Sumber: http://rss.cnn.com/c/35494/f/676977/s/4972b01a/sc/7/l/0L0Scnn0N0C20A150C0A80C250Ctech0Cmichigan0Eflamethrowers0Edebate0Cindex0Bhtml0Deref0Frss0Itech/story01.htm

Related Posts:

PhotoFast EVO Plus, USB OTG Inovatif Untuk IDevice


Jakarta - Seiring meningkatnya mobilitas masyarakat modern, perusahaan teknologi dituntut untuk mengembangkan dan menyederhanakan penanganan data di berbagai perangkat.

Terkait hal tersebut, PhotoFast meluncurkan EVO Plus, USB On The Go (OTG) pertama di dunia dan hanya satu-satunya cross-platform drive yang memberikan fleksibilitas bagi pengguna untuk melakukan mentransfer dan mengelola data untuk multimedia file di iOS, Android, PC dan Mac.

"PhotoFast akan terus membawa solusi inovatif kepada pasar. Sebab EVO Plus benar-benar sebuah perangkat untuk semua orang," kata Dersan Kacmaz, Direktur Marketing PhotoFast, dalam keterangan tertulisnya.

"Kita melihat keluarga, kantor atau pengguna individu yang beroperasi di beberapa platform OS baik Android, iOS, Windows, Mac setiap hari. Pertanyaannya adalah mengapa tidak tidak ada perangkat yang bisa digunakan yang sederhana dan bisa digunakan oleh semua orang," imbuhnya.

Meski kini terdapat banyak OTG Android di pasaran, namun PhotoFast EVO Plus menawarkan kelebihan istimewa kepada semua pengguna perangkat Apple melalui fitur SuperSpeed USB 3.0 yang tersimpan dalam satu drive demi menghilangkan penggunaan konektor atau kabel.

Apalagi Apple belum lama ini merilis fitur perekaman video 4K pada iPhone 6S dengan bantuan kamera 12 MP-nya, sehingga secara tidak langsung membutuhkan media khusus untuk mentransfer ukuran file raksasa yang dihasilkannya.

Bila dihitung, setiap menit video 4K yang ditransfer membutuhkan penyimpanan sebesar 375MB.

Baca Juga : 5 USB OTG Dual Flash Terbaik Berharga Murah

Bila ditransfer lewat OTG biasa, kapasitas penyimpanannya mungkin belum memadai. Namun. dengan PhotoFast EVO Plus yang memiliki memori 64GB, semua itu tidak akan menjadi masalah.

Menariknya lagi, PhotoFast EVO Plus juga berpadu dengan aplikasi i-FlashDrive ONE yang memberikan kecerdasan User Interface (UI) untuk menawarkan keamanan, back-up data, dan solusi penyimpanan yang paling nyaman bahkan yang paling canggih bagi pengguna.

Mengenai ketersediaan PhotoFast EVO Plus, bisa didapatkan di iBox, Infinite, eStore, Emax, Story-I, Wellcomm, mE Gallery, dan pembelian online via Lazada, Elevenia, Metrodataonline, Tokopedia, dan Bhinneka.

Soal harga, PhotoFast EVO Plus ditawarkan untuk 16GB adalah Rp999.000 dan untuk 32GB dibanderol Rp1.199.000. [ikh]



Sumber: http://teknologi.inilah.com/read/detail/2238704/photofast-evo-plus-usb-otg-inovatif-untuk-idevice

Related Posts: